In Defense Of God

God is, even though the whole world deny him. Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is self-sustained. Mahatma Gandhi 

As Hitler was guilty for killing the Jews even though he may have not killed one Jew, he is still as guilty for killing them as the soldiers who pulled the triggers . With that in mind, if God was to order or to tell someone to do something, does it make him any real or any less guilty in helping someone? What if God was behind something, like the helping of a starving child? Does that make Him not guilty of doing a good deed and thus not just doing nothing? However, that would only apply if you believe that God is real or you have a war with Him.

If we were able to corner God and put Him up for trial, we wouldn't be able to judge Him. The reason we wouldn't be able to do so, is that in court one is to be judge by his/her equals. Just as we would not be judge by a bunch of monkeys, as that would be unfair, so would it be so if a god was judged by mere mortals. In this instance, the only way we could judge God would be by finding a bunch of other gods. And that, is highly unlikely since people aren't willing to believe in one God, let alone enough gods to do a whole jury.

A lot of people accuse God of doing nothing. However, how do we really know that He is doing nothing? We don't know if terrorist are going to kill people, but we know they are planning, and we see this when they kill people. What if we don't see things as they really are? What if humans are agents of God and they do his bidding? What if things that we didn't see as before are God's tools? Does that make Him any more real? Or does it make us God paranoia? Seeing everything as God when in fact it isn't? Well paranoia is not paranoia if it's true. So is it true?

With the arguments against for God, they have been quite silly. However, to be precise, they have both been quite poorly constructed. One of the reasons so is that the religious and the Atheist are humans. This means they have feelings and emotions. Making them easy prey to emotions. While feelings are good, it is one of the reasons that the arguments are flawed as they have more feelings than logic. 

Another reason for the arguments not always fully succeeding, would be the fact that you cannot prove or disprove that God is real. If you cannot find something, you cannot fully prove that it is so, nor can you disprove it just because you don't know what to test for it not being real.

At the end of the day, science cannot prove everything. Howbeit, faith is called faith for a reason. With that in mind, that is usually where arguments fall into a uneasy rest between the two contenders. Nevertheless, to sum it up, it does not matter what we think, God is real. Why? Well, firstly, either because He is real, or, He is real because others believe in Him in such a manner that it affects others in a very real manner, that an invisible person couldn't do.