When
you think of a humanitarian, you think of someone with a bleeding
heart, or someone who really cares for the well-being of others.
However, when you really think about what does a humanitarian mean,
you might find that a true one is a lot colder and harsher, then what
we originally have seen with other humanitarians.
Championing
the issues that surround refugees, that sounds a like a humanitarian
cause. However, what if it’s not to champion them, but rather the
people who don’t want them? While it might seem strange, what if
the humanitarian saw it fit to help that type of human being?
Humanitarian,
doesn’t really mean that you champion just anybody who seems a
stereotypical cause. As the world goes, we might just seem different
types of humanitarians. For a true humanitarian, is one who does
things for the good of humanity. Furthermore, the dictionary goes on
to say that a humanitarian, is someone who tries to make humans
happy.
It
is rather ambiguous isn’t it? Make humans happy, make humans
welfare better.
However,
what we see in most cases, is that humanitarians, only seem
interested in the plight of those that they deem in third world
countries, or needing a home. Whatever it is, you see humanitarians
as people who try and fix problems with aid, with making people who
they deem in need of help.
But
as said before, a humanitarian, is someone who helps humans, and
tries to make them happy. The humanitarians of today, aren’t really
doing that. They are bias, because they only help those of a certain
kind. They only seem to provide aid for those that scream and yell
the loudest. Technically, the humanitarians that we see in this life,
they have failed their cause. They have failed because a lot of the
times they are only catering for only certain type of people. Or
whenever when they say help these humans, they are upsetting another
set of humans.
Meaning
how are they really fulfilling their cause? Isn’t their cause to
help as many humans. Isn’t their cause to help any human and not
just economical refugees, not just people in third world countries?
Furthermore, if their purpose is to help humans, shouldn’t it mean
that if they help one human they don’t hurt another human?
Yes,
this might seem strange, but if a humanitarian is really a true
humanitarian, they will help anyone, and do anything for the greater
good for all mankind and womankind. Meaning in theory, they wouldn’t
be just someone who sends aid, in the form of food, but force to make
things better for humanity.
We
may have been trained to see only one type of aid to a group of
humans, but if we did see a different type of the stereotypical one,
what would we call them? A humanitarian, is a very broad meaning, and
the ones we see wearing the UN uniform aren’t just the only
humanitarians or those that help third world countries. There are
others, and there are many, because a humanitarian, is just someone
who helps humanity, not just one type or need, but anything and
anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment